- - - Doing right is even harder than it looks. ?_?
The ado is about Rep. Anthony Weiner's public pubic. "Is that an iPhone in your panties or
are you just glad to be seen by me?" Weiner serves the pubic - err- public.
Yes, the congressman who married Hillary Clinton's long time paid room mate, Huma.
Rep. Weiner continues lame explanations for his wiener twitter post.
Apparently Rep. Anthony Weiner was prancing around in his panties over the Memorial Day weekend.
Or someone was in their panties. Someone had an iPhone. Then someone snapped a picture of the panties with something in them.
Then someone posted the photo of the panties on Weiner's Twitter account. And not just any recipient was selected.
the post was to a voluptuous college student. Hmmmm.
Weiner at first, said his account was hacked. Then Weiner said that the account was 'pranked'. (Pracked?)
At first many, including the college student, seemed to help play down the scandal. But the hunger for the
story has not abated. The popularity of the story has continued despite myriad explanations.
Weiner has used every technigue from his Spoken Communications 101 text book. Weiner's attempts to
quell the story have provided all Speech Communication 101 teachers with
contemporary examples for the core concepts of their course. And then some...
Speech Communications 101 concepts :
1. Misinformation
2. Repetition
3. Hypothetical
4. Dismissal
5. Fantastic self aggrandizing hypothetical
6. Disinformation
7. Reasoning by association
8. Reasoning from the unbelievable to the crazy (see Twitter post)
9. Reasoning from the crazy to the rediculous ( see poor word choice section)
Most of Weiner's explanations are demonstrably improbable if not impossible. Some of his arguments defy common sense. Weiner has avoided a categoric denial of the post of the pubic; this only titillates the press and the public.
About the only explanations that Weiner has not offered are:
1. The impossible, "The dog did it." (no record of a dog with thumbs)
2. Or the at least plausible, "Huma twitted it."
Which brings us to to these speculations. Huma doesn't shave her upper legs!? What is that in her panties? Not Jimmy Dean's link sausages. Whose kielbasa? Weiner's? Which one? Hmmmmm...
The ado is about Rep. Anthony Weiner's public pubic. "Is that an iPhone in your panties or
are you just glad to be seen by me?" Weiner serves the pubic - err- public.
Yes, the congressman who married Hillary Clinton's long time paid room mate, Huma.
Rep. Weiner continues lame explanations for his wiener twitter post.
Apparently Rep. Anthony Weiner was prancing around in his panties over the Memorial Day weekend.
Or someone was in their panties. Someone had an iPhone. Then someone snapped a picture of the panties with something in them.
Then someone posted the photo of the panties on Weiner's Twitter account. And not just any recipient was selected.
the post was to a voluptuous college student. Hmmmm.
Weiner at first, said his account was hacked. Then Weiner said that the account was 'pranked'. (Pracked?)
At first many, including the college student, seemed to help play down the scandal. But the hunger for the
story has not abated. The popularity of the story has continued despite myriad explanations.
Weiner has used every technigue from his Spoken Communications 101 text book. Weiner's attempts to
quell the story have provided all Speech Communication 101 teachers with
contemporary examples for the core concepts of their course. And then some...
Speech Communications 101 concepts :
1. Misinformation
2. Repetition
3. Hypothetical
4. Dismissal
5. Fantastic self aggrandizing hypothetical
6. Disinformation
7. Reasoning by association
8. Reasoning from the unbelievable to the crazy (see Twitter post)
9. Reasoning from the crazy to the rediculous ( see poor word choice section)
Most of Weiner's explanations are demonstrably improbable if not impossible. Some of his arguments defy common sense. Weiner has avoided a categoric denial of the post of the pubic; this only titillates the press and the public.
About the only explanations that Weiner has not offered are:
1. The impossible, "The dog did it." (no record of a dog with thumbs)
2. Or the at least plausible, "Huma twitted it."
Which brings us to to these speculations. Huma doesn't shave her upper legs!? What is that in her panties? Not Jimmy Dean's link sausages. Whose kielbasa? Weiner's? Which one? Hmmmmm...
